Morons

| | Comments (3)

Effort to remove pro-gay marriage judges

It amazes me how stupid and short sighted some people are. How many idiots does it take to elect a moron representative? Emile Goguen, a Representative from Massachusetts, is planning to file legislation to oust the justices who ruled in favor of making the state recognize marriage for gay couples. I guess if you don't like how they interpret the law, you now replace them.

A group that opposes gay marriage has enlisted the help of a state legislator in a long-shot attempt to remove the four justices of the state's high court who ruled that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional.

Democratic state Rep. Emile J. Goguen told The Boston Globe that he planned to file legislation to oust the justices on Tuesday, even though he is the measure's only sponsor.

He sees the bill as a way to pressure members of the Supreme Judicial Court to reconsider their 4-3 decision.

I know that our democracy isn't perfect. It's mainly because people like Rep. Goguen are trying to use their authority to change the rulings from the court. It makes me sick the way they abuse their power and nothing was a better example of this than watching the legislature of Massachusetts try to wrangle out of the decision of the court. Even now, Mass. Governor Mitt Romney is trying to use a law written in 1913 against gay marriage, knowing full well that the law was addressing a completely different issue.

Then we have our own President ("Moron High Leader") who calls the justices "activist judges" and calls for an amendment to the Constitution to stop all judges from ruling that discrimination against gays is wrong. Right now, it's not pleasant to hear and have to endure what these bigots are trying to do, but I will tell you this; history will not look favorably on these individuals. History will reflect on these people as being short sighted, putting their own wishes ahead of their elected office, and failing to represent all the people. That's the main reason that I take the time and energy to talk about these people. I want the record to be there and as long as I live, I want this information to expose them for what they are, even if I have to do it one bigot at a time.

3 Comments

Doug said:

I know what you mean about how history will judge these people. I hold that as a small comfort while living in these times. And I put them on my blog for the same reason. I want no one to forget these people on the wrong side of progress. I've even thought of putting together a page dedicated just to them just for posterity.

Bill said:

Yes... but this is what I'm afraid of in terms of out of staters. I know that there are efforts to abolish the 1913 law and all of this is still up in the air. It's still a political struggle.

Meanwhile, Romney said same-sex couples who live outside the state will not be allowed to marry in Massachusetts when the law takes effect. He cited a 1913 law barring unions that would not be legal in the couples' home state.

"Massachusetts should not become the Las Vegas of same-sex marriage," he told The New York Times for a story in Sunday's editions. "We do not intend to export our marriage confusion to the entire nation."

Supporters of gay marriage say the 1913 law is discriminatory and was never envisioned to block same-sex marriage. They criticize Romney for adopting the broadest interpretation possible for the law.

Romney ordered changes to the state's marriage application, including now asking applicants for evidence of where a person resides and intends to reside. It warns out-of-state couples that if they do not intend to reside in Massachusetts, the marriage "shall be null and void." (source)

Will said:

On the other hand, Governor Romney's special legal counsel has informed the state's Justices of the Peace that they have only two choices when same sex marriage becomes legal on May 17--marry any same sex couple who comes before them or submit their resignations. His statement says specifically that, despite his own personal reservations, Romney will uphold the new law on this point. See designerblog for the whole story.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Bill published on April 25, 2004 7:00 PM.

Under the weather was the previous entry in this blog.

Students suspended over T-shirts is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Our Blogroll

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en
Enhanced with Snapshots